<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for cultural dichotomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.culturaldichotomy.com</link>
	<description>living in one culture trying to impact another</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Cultural Acumen by Meriwether Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/08/25/cultural-acumen/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Meriwether Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/?p=50#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Good post, and a great thought for us all.  As you would probably agree, knowing about a culture and knowing a culture are on the opposite ends of the spectrum. 

As to your question, I think you can gain an appreciation for a culture by learning about them, but you cannot gain an accurate understanding of a culture without knowing them.  Knowing about them may include visiting their culture for a vacation, reading books about their history, challenges, and successes.  Knowing them is more intimate, and it is much more difficult.  I wouldn't think you coul know a cluture without spending a lot of time with the people of that culture, and even then, although you are starting to know them, your understanding is only partial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, and a great thought for us all.  As you would probably agree, knowing about a culture and knowing a culture are on the opposite ends of the spectrum. </p>
<p>As to your question, I think you can gain an appreciation for a culture by learning about them, but you cannot gain an accurate understanding of a culture without knowing them.  Knowing about them may include visiting their culture for a vacation, reading books about their history, challenges, and successes.  Knowing them is more intimate, and it is much more difficult.  I wouldn&#8217;t think you coul know a cluture without spending a lot of time with the people of that culture, and even then, although you are starting to know them, your understanding is only partial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multiple Choice by Multiple Choice &#124; camel crossing</title>
		<link>http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/08/06/multiple-choice/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Multiple Choice &#124; camel crossing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/08/06/multiple-choice/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>[...] :::this is from Cultural Dichotomy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] :::this is from Cultural Dichotomy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multiple Choice by Meriwether Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/08/06/multiple-choice/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Meriwether Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/08/06/multiple-choice/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Well, good question. The neighbors we have that are our age are believers (both couples are pretty neat). There is a couple in their 50's and a couple in their 70's that live right by us as well. With Herman (70's), I've only gotten to 'D' in five years. He's a tough one. You have to earn his respect.  Also, with the other couple, I've only arrived at 'D'. That's a hard one as well.

To answer the question, I would answer 'D' to 'A', in that order (changing a few things of course, like part b  of option C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, good question. The neighbors we have that are our age are believers (both couples are pretty neat). There is a couple in their 50&#8217;s and a couple in their 70&#8217;s that live right by us as well. With Herman (70&#8217;s), I&#8217;ve only gotten to &#8216;D&#8217; in five years. He&#8217;s a tough one. You have to earn his respect.  Also, with the other couple, I&#8217;ve only arrived at &#8216;D&#8217;. That&#8217;s a hard one as well.</p>
<p>To answer the question, I would answer &#8216;D&#8217; to &#8216;A&#8217;, in that order (changing a few things of course, like part b  of option C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Practically Speaking by shorty</title>
		<link>http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/07/31/practically-speaking/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>shorty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/?p=38#comment-83</guid>
		<description>@mentanna - I hadn't really thought about a series, but that's a good idea. I'll let it brew for a while and see what I come up with.

@meriwether - I don't think loving them and "what am I supposed to say to point them toward Christ" are mutually exclusive. In fact, I think they're one in the same. To love someone is to point them to Christ. You point them to Christ by being Christ to them, talking about Christ to them, teaching them about Christ, etc. I do agree that we shouldn't "worry" about the end result of the conversation, but for those that don't know the first few steps in how to engage someone, either of their own culture or of another, telling them to just love isn't going to result in anything. Which, by the way, is why the overwhelming majority of christians sit on the pew on Sundays and do nothing to live out their faith during the week...but I think I've already written about that.

I don't know, maybe we're saying similar things, but I know that Margie's advice has to be the beginning. We have to have a broken heart for those around us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mentanna - I hadn&#8217;t really thought about a series, but that&#8217;s a good idea. I&#8217;ll let it brew for a while and see what I come up with.</p>
<p>@meriwether - I don&#8217;t think loving them and &#8220;what am I supposed to say to point them toward Christ&#8221; are mutually exclusive. In fact, I think they&#8217;re one in the same. To love someone is to point them to Christ. You point them to Christ by being Christ to them, talking about Christ to them, teaching them about Christ, etc. I do agree that we shouldn&#8217;t &#8220;worry&#8221; about the end result of the conversation, but for those that don&#8217;t know the first few steps in how to engage someone, either of their own culture or of another, telling them to just love isn&#8217;t going to result in anything. Which, by the way, is why the overwhelming majority of christians sit on the pew on Sundays and do nothing to live out their faith during the week&#8230;but I think I&#8217;ve already written about that.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, maybe we&#8217;re saying similar things, but I know that Margie&#8217;s advice has to be the beginning. We have to have a broken heart for those around us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Practically Speaking by Meriwether Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/07/31/practically-speaking/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Meriwether Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/?p=38#comment-82</guid>
		<description>I think one thing I'd like to point out is the love (or lack thereof) we show all people, created by Him (intergenerational, believers, hypocrites, and non-believers).  Many times we (I) try to overanalyze situations with non-believers.  Don't get me wrong, we definitely need to continually have a focus on Christ while interacting, sharing, working with, or coming in contact with - everyone, but sometimes our focus moves from love to 'what am I supposed to say to this non-believer to point him or her toward Christ'.  We are called first to love the Lord, and second to love our neighbor.  Why is it so hard to push our analytical thoughts aside and simply show love toward one another.  Wasn't that the way it was meant?

James covers this in Chapter 2 of his book/ speech.  Simply love people (not so simple), based on your faith, meeting the needs of those who need the Lord.  I know that seeking to learn how to love people starts with a deep introspective analysis on how we view/ treat people (making sure it is in accordance with God's Word), but it transforms into a love for people that only Christ could have given you.  What a great thing to have.  This is where James 2 comes in.  What good is it to know how to love without demonstrating that love to people we come into contact with daily, our mission if you will.  At this point, it is not our job to worry about the end result of a conversation (whether or not we gave someone enough information to get saved), we can rest in the comfort, for that particular instance, that we were able to be obedient in loving someone who was not like us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one thing I&#8217;d like to point out is the love (or lack thereof) we show all people, created by Him (intergenerational, believers, hypocrites, and non-believers).  Many times we (I) try to overanalyze situations with non-believers.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, we definitely need to continually have a focus on Christ while interacting, sharing, working with, or coming in contact with - everyone, but sometimes our focus moves from love to &#8216;what am I supposed to say to this non-believer to point him or her toward Christ&#8217;.  We are called first to love the Lord, and second to love our neighbor.  Why is it so hard to push our analytical thoughts aside and simply show love toward one another.  Wasn&#8217;t that the way it was meant?</p>
<p>James covers this in Chapter 2 of his book/ speech.  Simply love people (not so simple), based on your faith, meeting the needs of those who need the Lord.  I know that seeking to learn how to love people starts with a deep introspective analysis on how we view/ treat people (making sure it is in accordance with God&#8217;s Word), but it transforms into a love for people that only Christ could have given you.  What a great thing to have.  This is where James 2 comes in.  What good is it to know how to love without demonstrating that love to people we come into contact with daily, our mission if you will.  At this point, it is not our job to worry about the end result of a conversation (whether or not we gave someone enough information to get saved), we can rest in the comfort, for that particular instance, that we were able to be obedient in loving someone who was not like us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Practically Speaking by mentanna</title>
		<link>http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/07/31/practically-speaking/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>mentanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/?p=38#comment-81</guid>
		<description>i think this could be a blog series don't you?  thanks for publishing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this could be a blog series don&#8217;t you?  thanks for publishing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Gap by shorty</title>
		<link>http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/07/18/the-gap/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>shorty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/?p=33#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Wow ML - I really disagree with your assessment of #10. I can think of tons of believers I know that when asked about their daily life in relation to their beliefs would respond by saying that they live out what they believe. Try it out at your church this Sunday. Do an informal poll of 10 to 15 people. You might be surprised by the responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow ML - I really disagree with your assessment of #10. I can think of tons of believers I know that when asked about their daily life in relation to their beliefs would respond by saying that they live out what they believe. Try it out at your church this Sunday. Do an informal poll of 10 to 15 people. You might be surprised by the responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Gap by Meriwether Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/07/18/the-gap/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Meriwether Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/?p=33#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Comments on couple of points (some of them seem a little made up, but could be true):

1. I disagree, I believe we have the know how, we just choose not to care (ouch).  It's not convenient.
7. I hear pastors all the time mention this, and there seems to always be a focus on being effective at work.  I would disagree with his assesment, only to add that we ignore this teaching.  I believe it is taught and ignored, as are many other biblical truths.  I think this could be many pastors' greatest frustration.

9. One also needs to be very careful that the 'spiritual' and or theological books they are reading are sound, and that their basis for action is the Word.  I believe there are too many who quote books instead of scripture.  

10. Not sure about this one, most actual believers I know would readily admit the disconnect (I think).  Not sure where he got that information.

Loving and serving others is hard.  It takes selflessness and obedience (and we are selfish and unobedient), which is all the more reason we need to change our behavior.  I'm excited to see where this goes.

Question for another day:  Does God need us to make him 'relevant', or is he, through his scriptures, just as relevant today as he has always been?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments on couple of points (some of them seem a little made up, but could be true):</p>
<p>1. I disagree, I believe we have the know how, we just choose not to care (ouch).  It&#8217;s not convenient.<br />
7. I hear pastors all the time mention this, and there seems to always be a focus on being effective at work.  I would disagree with his assesment, only to add that we ignore this teaching.  I believe it is taught and ignored, as are many other biblical truths.  I think this could be many pastors&#8217; greatest frustration.</p>
<p>9. One also needs to be very careful that the &#8217;spiritual&#8217; and or theological books they are reading are sound, and that their basis for action is the Word.  I believe there are too many who quote books instead of scripture.  </p>
<p>10. Not sure about this one, most actual believers I know would readily admit the disconnect (I think).  Not sure where he got that information.</p>
<p>Loving and serving others is hard.  It takes selflessness and obedience (and we are selfish and unobedient), which is all the more reason we need to change our behavior.  I&#8217;m excited to see where this goes.</p>
<p>Question for another day:  Does God need us to make him &#8216;relevant&#8217;, or is he, through his scriptures, just as relevant today as he has always been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Gap by sb</title>
		<link>http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/07/18/the-gap/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>sb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/?p=33#comment-75</guid>
		<description>What we're seeing is that the "old school" is stuck on the Sunday as the "holy" day, and Mon-Sat are the days that you simply "have to" get through.  Mon-Sat are not seen as "holy", they are not seen as opportunity, but drudgery.  Colossians 3 "Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for men," is used to motivate the "saints" to action within the bounds of the Church, rather than a continual reminder that Jesus is your mentor, boss, superior, foreman on the job.

Our busi-ness IS our mission...we are to work in the name of Jesus and by the power of God's Spirit, our Sunday is our day for physical rest.  We've GOT to get this...sales, IT, PT, truck driving, teaching; these are our missions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we&#8217;re seeing is that the &#8220;old school&#8221; is stuck on the Sunday as the &#8220;holy&#8221; day, and Mon-Sat are the days that you simply &#8220;have to&#8221; get through.  Mon-Sat are not seen as &#8220;holy&#8221;, they are not seen as opportunity, but drudgery.  Colossians 3 &#8220;Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for men,&#8221; is used to motivate the &#8220;saints&#8221; to action within the bounds of the Church, rather than a continual reminder that Jesus is your mentor, boss, superior, foreman on the job.</p>
<p>Our busi-ness IS our mission&#8230;we are to work in the name of Jesus and by the power of God&#8217;s Spirit, our Sunday is our day for physical rest.  We&#8217;ve GOT to get this&#8230;sales, IT, PT, truck driving, teaching; these are our missions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Gap by Brandon Lawshe</title>
		<link>http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/2008/07/18/the-gap/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Lawshe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturaldichotomy.com/?p=33#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Keep us up to date on what you're teaching so we may bridge the gap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep us up to date on what you&#8217;re teaching so we may bridge the gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
